<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News reporting discretion lacking in online age</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msu-underground.com/archives/973/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msu-underground.com/archives/973</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Student Publication of Missouri State University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 22:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Bassett</title>
		<link>http://www.msu-underground.com/archives/973/comment-page-1#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Bassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msu-underground.com/?p=973#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Man you sound pretty high and lofty about your notions of journalistic credibility.

1. News is what sells. Corporate journalism is barely more legitimate than yellow journalism, as the ultimate goal is to generate circulation for advertisers, there will always been an atmosphere of pettiness, because that&#039;s what people like to read.

2. Politicians, and politics are very much a gossip game. We&#039;re talking about plutocrats who operate in a world where the how much your haircut cost is more important than your standing on HR**** and what sort of equity policy you plan to incorporate into the bill. See that? I did it right there. You honestly care more about the hair cut part of that sentence than the wordy, boring mush of adultstuff at the end of it.

3. dude you just wrote an article about Adam Lambert. I didn&#039;t even know who he was until my eyes unfortunately grazed over that piece of shoe cheese airheaded entertainment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man you sound pretty high and lofty about your notions of journalistic credibility.</p>
<p>1. News is what sells. Corporate journalism is barely more legitimate than yellow journalism, as the ultimate goal is to generate circulation for advertisers, there will always been an atmosphere of pettiness, because that&#8217;s what people like to read.</p>
<p>2. Politicians, and politics are very much a gossip game. We&#8217;re talking about plutocrats who operate in a world where the how much your haircut cost is more important than your standing on HR**** and what sort of equity policy you plan to incorporate into the bill. See that? I did it right there. You honestly care more about the hair cut part of that sentence than the wordy, boring mush of adultstuff at the end of it.</p>
<p>3. dude you just wrote an article about Adam Lambert. I didn&#8217;t even know who he was until my eyes unfortunately grazed over that piece of shoe cheese airheaded entertainment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

